For the operating record of a large company
Sell enterprise data to AI, starting from the contracts it sits under
A large company's decisions, approvals and exceptions live inside cloud platforms and ERP suites, each on its own contract. We read 11 documents from 8 of those vendors, the newest on 2026-10-28, and 3 keep a right to use customer data in usage, de-identified or aggregated form.
Source: Enterprise software data terms: every row, with its source
- 3 of 8
- enterprise vendors keeping a usage, de-identified or aggregated use of customer data (Enterprise software data terms: every row, with its source)
- 4 of 8
- vendors whose own contract says the customer keeps title to its data (Enterprise software data terms: every row, with its source)
- 5 of 8
- vendors stating they will not train AI on customer data (Enterprise software data terms: every row, with its source)
- 2026-10-28
- newest read of an enterprise vendor's terms on this board (Enterprise software data terms: every row, with its source)
The process
- Item 01
- Name the systems the record lives in, how many years it covers and whether the company is trading, closing or changing hands.
- Item 02
- We set those systems against the vendor clauses on the board and the trade secret, insider and foreign-buyer rules that bear on a large company.
- Item 03
- We reply with the shape that fits: a licence while the company trades, a sale of a closing company's records by its directors before any liquidator, administrator or winding-up petition, and by the office-holder or under a court order after, or a route agreed with the adviser who introduced you.
No vendor or buyer pays to appear here and the site carries no affiliate links. The answers are our reading of each published document, not legal advice on any contract you signed. If a company licenses or sells its record to a buyer we introduce, it pays us 12.5% of the deal, with a minimum, when we act as its exclusive agent, or 10%, with a minimum, when its data joins a bundle or the pool, agreed in writing beforehand, and any fee a buyer pays us comes off the company's share.
Enterprise vendor terms on a customer's data, vendor by vendor
Last updated
One row per ERP, data-cloud or analytics vendor whose documents we read, each answer resting on a sentence from the document beside it. Not stated means the documents we read leave the question open; varies means two of the vendor's documents answer it differently.
Each vendor's own published terms were read through estate-fetch and stored whole (sha256 on every row). For every document, four questions were answered from the vendor's own words: who owns the business's data, vendor keeps aggregated or anonymised use, training AI on the business's data, export at exit. Every stated answer carries the sentence it rests on, checked against the stored text; 'not stated' means the document read does not address the question. A vendor with several documents reads 'varies' where they disagree. 8 vendors, 11 documents.
| Enterprise vendor | Who holds title to customer data | Usage, de-identified or aggregated use kept | Whether the vendor trains AI on it | Getting the data back at the end | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Web Services | the business | reserved | may train | on request | AWS Customer Agreement |
| Databricks | the business | reserved | will not train | no export promised | Master Cloud Services Agreement |
| Epicor | not stated | not stated | will not train | not stated | Epicor Prism, UK and Europe |
| Google Cloud | the business | not stated | not stated | no export promised | Google Cloud Platform Terms of Service |
| Infor | not stated | not stated | not stated | 30 days | Multi-tenant Cloud Customer Bill of Rights |
| Microsoft | not stated | not stated | will not train | not stated | Dynamics 365 and Power Platform Copilot data FAQ |
| Palantir | not stated | not stated | will not train | not stated | AIP security and privacy |
| Snowflake | the business | reserved | will not train | 30 days | Snowflake Terms of Service |
- 3 of the 8 enterprise vendors on this board keep a right to use customer data in usage, de-identified or aggregated form, read up to 2026-10-28. (Enterprise software data terms: every row, with its source)
Cite this page
“Enterprise vendor terms on a customer's data, vendor by vendor”, Sell Enterprise Data To AI, https://sellenterprisedatatoai.com/ (updated 2026-10-28). Each vendor's own published terms were read through estate-fetch and stored whole (sha256 on every row). For every document, four questions were answered from the vendor's own words: who owns the business's data, vendor keeps aggregated or anonymised use, training AI on the business's data, export at exit. Every stated answer carries the sentence it rests on, checked against the stored text; 'not stated' means the document read does not address the question. A vendor with several documents reads 'varies' where they disagree. 8 vendors, 11 documents.
Tell us about the operating record your company holds
Go deeper
Each one cites where its numbers come from.
Do enterprise vendors train AI on customer data? Their own words
What Snowflake, Databricks, AWS, Microsoft, Palantir and Epicor publish about training AI on a customer's data, read in their own terms and trust pages.
Who buys enterprise data for AI, and on what terms
The intermediaries asking large companies for operating data to license to AI labs: what each takes, how to apply and what each says about anonymising.
Is company data a trade secret? What the US and UK laws say
When operating data counts as a trade secret under the Defend Trade Secrets Act and the UK Trade Secrets Regulations 2018, and why it matters in a licence.
Can a public company sell its data? Insider and disclosure rules
What Regulation FD and the UK Market Abuse Regulation mean for a listed company licensing its data, with the competition and foreign-buyer rules beside them.
Selling a company to private equity: what happens to its data
A company sold to private equity takes its operating record with it: the stockholder and director rules, the UK national security notice and licensing first.
Can a large company license its internal records to AI? The UK rules
Can a company of hundreds of staff license its internal records to an AI buyer? The UK GDPR steps before a sale, what buyers publish on deal size, and what stays out.
Straight answers
Can a large company sell enterprise data to AI while the vendors still hold it?
Often yes, because the contracts we read leave title with the customer: 4 of the 8 vendors on the board say so in their own words, among them Snowflake, Databricks and Google Cloud. What a vendor keeps is narrower, usually a right to usage data, so the record itself stays yours to license.(Enterprise software data terms: every row, with its source)
Do enterprise software vendors train AI on our records?
Most of those that address it say they do not: 5 of the 8 vendors read state a no-training position, Microsoft's Dynamics 365 and Power Platform guidance with an exception for a tenant that consents. AWS's service terms are the one case on the board where a named service may use content to improve itself.(Enterprise software data terms: every row, with its source)
How long is there to pull the data out when a contract ends?
It differs sharply. Snowflake gives up to thirty calendar days after termination to retrieve customer data and Infor's bill of rights promises a native-form return within 30 days, while the Google Cloud and Databricks agreements we read end access when the contract ends. Plan the export before the notice goes in.(Enterprise software data terms: every row, with its source)
Who takes enterprise operating data today?
The organisations whose own pages we read are intermediaries that license it on to AI labs. Appen, Centific, micro1, Mercor, Nyne, Troveo and Polyshares each publish a page asking companies for workflows, tickets, documents or whole operating records, and most of them describe removing personal data before anything is passed on.(Enterprise software data terms: every row, with its source)
Is a listed company free to license data that could move its share price?
Not without care. Regulation FD makes an issuer that discloses material nonpublic information to certain people publish it, simultaneously when the disclosure was intentional, and the UK Market Abuse Regulation treats passing on inside information outside the normal exercise of a job or profession as unlawful disclosure.(Enterprise software data terms: every row, with its source)
Do foreign-buyer rules reach a sale of enterprise data?
They can. In the US the Justice Department's Data Security Program restricts transactions giving countries of concern access to bulk sensitive personal data, and 15 U.S.C. 9901 bars a data broker from selling such data to a foreign adversary. In the UK the National Security and Investment Act counts information of economic value as an asset an acquisition can catch.(Enterprise software data terms: every row, with its source)
Sources
This site's own datasets, every figure quoted from its source and dated:
- Who takes a large company's operating data: 5 of 10 organisations read on their own pages say a company keeps ownership of the operating data it licenses, newest read 28 October 2026.
- The rules a large company's data sale turns on: 6 of 14 legal texts read in GB and the US set conditions a company must meet before licensing its operating data, newest read 28 October 2026.
- Enterprise software data terms: 3 of 8 enterprise software vendors whose terms we read reserve the right to use their customers' data in aggregated or anonymised form, read 28 October 2026.
| No. | Source | Published by |
|---|---|---|
| [1] | AWS Customer Agreement | aws.amazon.com |
| [2] | AWS Service Terms | aws.amazon.com |
| [3] | Amazon Bedrock FAQs | aws.amazon.com |
| [4] | Google Cloud Platform Terms of Service | cloud.google.com |
| [5] | Google Cloud Service Specific Terms | cloud.google.com |
| [6] | Databricks Master Cloud Services Agreement | databricks.com |
| [7] | Databricks AI trust and safety | docs.databricks.com |
| [8] | Microsoft Products and Services Data Protection Addendum | microsoft.com |